Well, before you comment on a story, you could bother getting to know the facts behind it:
http://nationalreview.com/editorial/editors200509221416.asp
"Given the importance of the position and a history of mismanagement in the immigration service, Congress took the unusual step of inserting a statutory requirement that nominees have a minimum of five years of experience in both management and law enforcement. Even a cursory reading of her resume reveals that the well-connected 36-year-old attorney’s background fails to comply with this legal requirement; in fact, she meets the bare minimum only by counting her current stint in White House Personnel, where she manages, by her own account, “up to three deputies as well as support staff and interns.”"
Not exactly the kind of fully qualified candidate most people would want to protect our nation as head of the ICE division.
Especially when there are much better candidates out there.
Which begs the question: Why nominate her? Because she will be a good soldier and not try to hard to enforce ALL the laws?
So Gen Tommy Franks would be unqualified for this position?