Bush is farther to the left on spending than Bill Clinton was during his Presidency. And whoever succeeds Bush will be even farther to the left. If it's a Democrat, I'm not sure the Union will survive. We may have our own little 21st Century Boston Tea Party.
I'm not sure about you...but my taxes went down due to the Bush tax cut.
I agree completely... except for this:
A 'Rat next time might not be so bad from the fiscal perspective. Bush's spending is a futile attempt to prove himself to the underclass (who will never vote for him anyway). Clinton, for instance, didn't have to do that. He already knew he had them in his pocket. Instead he was forced to sign in NAFTA and welfare reform (for largely the same reasons Bush feels compelled to spend).
There's a strange irony to the whole political world.
Hmmm.. that was brilliant.. really.. BINGO....
A Boston Tea party -or- something like it... The thieves will not leave on their own..