Not quite true.
This wasn't a cheap shot like Clinton throws. Primarily his intention is to promote the Truth. This is why he included events under Reagan and Carter that contributed to the terror response of today by our enemies.
But, notice he named one act of Carter. One of Reagan. Numerous under Clinton. he could have chosen one, even two, but the number of instances he cites in the '90's is politically deliberate.
It was a clear, smooth shot at Clinton in part, though not whole.
Good points SS. Thanks