Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major SF earthquake could devastate housing, price out poor and elderly
AP ^ | 9/22/5 | BRIAN SKOLOFF

Posted on 09/22/2005 12:49:06 PM PDT by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Doc Savage
You wanna live on top of the San Andreas, then you pay the piper pal.

You must be kidding.

After the Northridge quake I cancelled my quake insurance.

The rates doubled and after seeing the FEDS giving out money to almost anyone I decided I was foolishly paying for something I didn't need.

Your tax money will be readily available to me next time, thanks in advance.

21 posted on 09/22/2005 1:13:11 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Minuteman at heart, couch potato in reality))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

"San Francisco destroyed by earthquake: GAYS hit the hardest"


22 posted on 09/22/2005 1:18:07 PM PDT by newfrpr04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
"And this story is relevant now why???????????????????"


Why?

You think the Atlanic and the Gulf of Mexico will stay hot throughout winter? What the heck are the media maroons gonna pitch, if not (((((((EARTHQUAKE!!)))))))


The odds are we won't get to see one of them reporting as a chasm opens up and swallows them.

Too bad ;)



23 posted on 09/22/2005 1:18:43 PM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If San Francisco gets a shakeout like New Orleans just did, perhaps that is not a bad thing. Poor people, so low on the scale that they fall into the unemployed underclass, have no business living in a city that cannot accommodate them in its economic profile. For them, the city offers little protection in the best of times, as they are preyed upon by the unscrupulous, and the daily incidentals are already available to them only by begging or as a charitable gesture.

Obviously, they need protection, as they are no longer, or have never been, fully functioning adults. Get them out of an uncertain environment, and away from the influences of a dreadful daily apocalypse.

And why do the underclass stay in the city, any city? Because it is easier to hide there, for whatever reason. Cities are anonymous, and for some persons, this allows a practically new beginning every day.

Communes in the central valley of California? And deal with the NIMBY phenomenon? It may have to be done, but at a cost of great political resistance. And not everybody KNOWS how to tend their own gardens.


24 posted on 09/22/2005 1:18:45 PM PDT by alloysteel ("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
Ha ha. I'm stealin' this:

and leaving you this:

25 posted on 09/22/2005 1:20:11 PM PDT by evets (God bless president Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"A major issue would be creating replacement housing for the poor in one of the nation's most expensive markets."


... but at least we have a good supply of broken, rusty cars, so every front lawn can have one !


26 posted on 09/22/2005 1:20:25 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This is pretty funny.
I'm solidly middle class, two of my three kids were born in San Francisco, and I was priced out years ago.
In spite of the deterioration there given a choice I would still be there. Only the rich and those on welfare, or old time residents or inheritors of homes can live there today.

Under those circumstances it's really tough for me to generate sympathy for "possibly displaced" poor.

27 posted on 09/22/2005 1:21:28 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

As a married heterosexual man, I am prepared. You wont see me begging and chanting on tv.


28 posted on 09/22/2005 1:34:01 PM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways "Guero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

Lets think of this for a moment -

San Francisco is in no greater earthquake danger than pretty much any place on the California coast. The whole place is at the edge of a plate. You could be talking about Los Angeles or San Jose and it wouldn't be any different.

Now, California needs cities to be economically viable, and it needs coastal cities. There aren't that many good places for coastal cities in CA, its got a pretty rugged coastline (the plates, see?).

SF and Oakland, San Jose, and points between, are in a really excellent place for cities, right there on the finest harbor in the west coast, on the biggest and only navigable river in California.

So if you want California at all as a significant state, San Francisco (and Oakland, San Jose, etc.) are the price you pay.


29 posted on 09/22/2005 1:57:55 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Chronicle headline:"Major Bay Area Quake,Women and Minorities Hardest Hit"


30 posted on 09/22/2005 2:05:46 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Another course would be abandon the foul place and disperse the inhabitants to the wind.


31 posted on 09/22/2005 2:08:48 PM PDT by bert (K.E. ; N.P . I smell a dead rat in Baton Rouge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets
Wow! You ROCK!

Dear diary...

32 posted on 09/22/2005 3:05:52 PM PDT by SquirrelKing (I'm not mean, you're just a sissy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


This is just water-carrying drive-by shill helping SF do some blame-shifting PR.
33 posted on 05/31/2016 8:45:11 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (I'll tell you what's wrong with society -- no one drinks from the skulls of their enemies anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
MrD has a relative that we have heard, lives under a bridge in San Fran.

Someone needs to warn him.

34 posted on 05/31/2016 8:49:21 AM PDT by Ditter (God Bless Texas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Women, Children and Minorities Hardest Hit.”


35 posted on 05/31/2016 8:50:33 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson