To: Piranha
Hello???
I was responding to your ridiculous statement...."You can't blame the Clinton administration for covering up information about 9/11"
That's all. Wanna try again?
65 posted on
09/22/2005 9:43:06 AM PDT by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: nuconvert
You can't blame the Clinton administration for covering up information about 9/11 because the Clinton administration was out office for more than 8 months when 9/11 occurred.
We don't know what the Clinton Administration did, and why. We do know, though, that it definitely was not with the intention of affecting the attacks of 9/11, which hadn't even occurred yet.
69 posted on
09/22/2005 9:46:26 AM PDT by
Piranha
To: nuconvert
Why is it that the media will give Clinton a pass when he states that in 1995-96 the US Government did not have any evidence to bring OBLaden to trial. In reality, Bin Laden had been named in a federal indictment -- provided the Southern District of the State of New York -- as an unindicted co-conspirator in the first Trade Towers bombing.
74 posted on
09/22/2005 9:49:18 AM PDT by
gaspar
To: nuconvert
Before this gets out of hand, everyone here is forgetting the Rummy may be in "charge" of the military bureaucracy, but he's not IN CHARGE of it.
Nixon didn't control the plumbers, Hirohito didn't control his generals.
Bureaucrats have an agenda all their very own, and often it makes no sense to anyone except other bureaucrats.
Like the rest of the country, you got red and blue paper pushers inside the Pentagon, all jockeying for position. This whole thing may well be a CYA op that got out of control because of a turf war or some other sort of back biting.
Yea, its Bush's Pentagon, I don't he or anyone in his admin knows what's up. Nor did Clinton, Nor did 41, nor Reagan and on and on.
81 posted on
09/22/2005 9:52:07 AM PDT by
Al Gator
(Remember to pillage BEFORE you burn!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson