To: SmithL
Ohhh... what a great idea.
If anything critical comes before an appeals court Bush should just call the most liberal justices and interview them for a possible promotion. Then they must recuse themselves from the case.
Right?
10 posted on
09/22/2005 8:13:20 AM PDT by
IMRight
To: IMRight
See the post immediately above yours.
13 posted on
09/22/2005 10:25:56 AM PDT by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: IMRight
If anything critical comes before an appeals court Bush should just call the most liberal justices and interview them for a possible promotion. Then they must recuse themselves from the case.Duh! Only Republicans need worry about conflict of interest, or the "appearance" of conflict of interest, or the "appearance of the appearance" of conflict of interest, or emanations from the penumbra of the conflict of interest, or whatever. Any dyed in the wool liberal is for the little guy so his integrity is beyond question. Don't you know anything?
14 posted on
09/22/2005 10:50:28 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
To: IMRight
If anything critical comes before an appeals court Bush should just call the most liberal justices and interview them for a possible promotion. Then they must recuse themselves from the case.Duh! Only Republicans need worry about conflict of interest, or the "appearance" of conflict of interest, or the "appearance of the appearance" of conflict of interest, or emanations from the penumbra of the conflict of interest, or whatever. Any dyed in the wool liberal is for the little guy so his integrity is beyond question. Don't you know anything?
15 posted on
09/22/2005 10:50:32 AM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson