[JohnnyM]

we can observe gravity in action. We have yet to observe a macro-evolutionary event or creation. It is faith that you believe these things occur the way you say they did. Just as I believe by faith that God created them from nothing. Science does not make untested assumptions, except, it seems, for cell to man evolution.

JM

[Dimensio]

we can observe gravity in action.

No, we observe the end result of what we've theorized as gravity in action. We can't claim certainty on what, exactly, caused what we observe but we can claim to have a good explanation behind it.

We have yet to observe a macro-evolutionary event or creation.

Just as we can observe the end-result of what we call gravitational theory, we can observe the end-result of what we call evolution theory. It is no different, and the only thing you are doing here is trying to redefine gravity to be something far more simplistic than what it really is.

[malakhi]

we can observe gravity in action. We have yet to observe a macro-evolutionary event or creation.

Nor have we observed many things in geology and cosmology. Not all science is done in a lab.

[anguish]

we can observe gravity in action

Yes, but only micro-gravity. Noone knows what happens when an object falls out of range of our sensors. This is why gravity is a theory in crisis!

[b_sharp]

"we can observe gravity in action. We have yet to observe a macro-evolutionary event or creation. It is faith that you believe these things occur the way you say they did. Just as I believe by faith that God created them from nothing. Science does not make untested assumptions, except, it seems, for cell to man evolution.

What exactly is a macro-evolutionary event?