"The objective is to convince people that Darwinism is inherently atheistic, thus shifting the debate from creationism vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the nonexistence of God," Johnson wrote in a 1999 article for Church and State magazine. "From there, people are introduced to 'the truth' of the Bible and then 'the question of sin' and finally 'introduced to Jesus.'"
Just so the agenda is clear; it's not science (you have no need for that) but about religious proslytesing.
For a specific religious sect.
In the classroom.
Pity about the First Amendment, that might slow you down a bit...
Huh? D' I publish a paper, I rely upon the First Article of the Bill of Rights, the paper is owned, as you know, by a church, again a right protected and guaranteed by the First Article of the Bill of Rights.
Why are you suddenly fighting us so hard?
Jake