Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: burzum

OK burzum,

- You seem like you would have some response to this somewhat ridiculous conversation I had with a co-worker today:

What would happen if you used a nuke to blow up/disrupt a hurricane?

Regards, KMJames


2,429 posted on 09/22/2005 2:27:15 PM PDT by KMJames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2338 | View Replies ]


To: KMJames
What would happen if you used a nuke to blow up/disrupt a hurricane?

Besides dispersing radioactive fallout all over the damn place, you mean? Uh, nothing.

2,469 posted on 09/22/2005 2:35:06 PM PDT by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing and become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2429 | View Replies ]

To: KMJames
What would happen if you used a nuke to blow up/disrupt a hurricane?

I think you would help it. The nuclear weapon is not going to make all the water disappear (except technically the water very close to it). It would heat the water in the hurricane allowing it to rise further. Then the water would precipitate starting a powerful cycle. While I can imagine that a nuclear weapon could disintegrate 'part' of an eyewall, it does nothing to remove the energy source or the moisture, so a new eyewall would rapidly form. The best attack might be if you dropped it significantly above the hurricane to one side to try to disrupt the outflow patterns (since you would be attacking the dryer air). But while nuclear weapons are impressive, I don't think they stack up anywhere near the power of a hurricane. A Hiroshima type blast would hardly be noticed. A 10 MT blast might cause more disruption, and I'd have to check the overpressure ratings for it, but I doubt that it would be effective more than perhaps 100 square miles (of something that is tens of thousands of square miles). I think the best response would be nothing more than causing an eyewall regeneration cycle. Of course, I'm not a meteorologist and I've never used a nuclear weapon (though I do have a very nice .40 cal handgun). I just have a strong knowledge of evaporation, boiling, and condensation from working on nuclear reactors.

2,484 posted on 09/22/2005 2:39:17 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.-Adm H Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2429 | View Replies ]

To: KMJames
One more thing I forgot to add. If you watch the videos of nuclear blasts you will notice that after the point where the fireball is visible, it is moving very fast up into the upper atmosphere. Very soon afterward it sucks up an impressive mushroom cloud. The mushroom cloud is formed by a region of low pressure forming after the hot gases climb into the upper atmosphere. If a nuclear weapon were dropped in the center of an eyewall, it would probably cause it to intensify significantly for a brief period of time (in my estimation).
2,525 posted on 09/22/2005 2:47:45 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.-Adm H Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2429 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson