To: Hank Rearden
"We" are also not party-uber-alles Republican Koolaid-stained toadies. Maybe you think anyone should have access to say "certain chemicals" and equipment? liberty right?
20 posted on
09/22/2005 12:52:49 AM PDT by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: Echo Talon
"We" also typically post when sober.
21 posted on
09/22/2005 12:54:12 AM PDT by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Echo Talon
" Maybe you think anyone should have access to say "certain chemicals" and equipment? liberty right?"
If you want to continue to eat without depending on foreign nationals for that, people should be allowed to produce fertilizer without being coerced into licensing their chickens (or federally licensing small trucks to haul them).
Before the current social program madness got out of hand, people didn't murder lots of other people with crude demolition devices. That's because most of us agreed that morality was important.
I'm very much not a Libertarian. Who wants a nation administered by contracts, lawsuits and ruled by those among our less trustworthy corporates and lawyers? But it is very foolish for our "elite" to be legislating or ordering laws or regulations to attempt to monitor so many daily activities of citizens in the pursuit of absolute safety. And it certainly is a reaction that we'd expect from cowardly, socialist despots.
25 posted on
09/22/2005 1:14:25 AM PDT by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson