Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zauber
The A320, like most modern airliners, does not have the capability to dump fuel. It is not uncommon these days for pilots to request airborne holding short of their destination in order to burn off fuel and get below their maximum safe landing weight.

Is there any good way for a pilot to increase fuel consumption? I would expect that if the plane would allow it the pilot could theoretically enter a steep climb at wide open throttle; if the thrust/weight ratio is less than 1:1 (as it is on any commercial jetliner) it should be possible to maintain stable airspeed in such fashion. On the other hand, that might not be very comfortable for the passengers, and might have safety problems besides. Any other alternatives?

19 posted on 09/21/2005 11:10:12 PM PDT by supercat (Don't fix blame--FIX THE PROBLEM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: supercat; Zauber; traumer; Zuben Elgenubi
Is there any good way for a pilot to increase fuel consumption?

Wouldn't it have been just as effective to fly towards their destination? But looking at their route map, there aren't any airports they have scheduled flights to between Denver and Buffalo near the great circle between LAX and JFK.


21 posted on 09/21/2005 11:21:07 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: supercat

There are several ways to increase fuel burn during a flight. Cruise at a lower than optimal altitude, fly faster than optimal cruise speed, fly at slow speeds with flaps extended and gear down to tremendously increase drag, etc.


31 posted on 09/22/2005 8:39:55 AM PDT by Zauber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson