Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Crackingham

It is unbecoming and improper for a sitting associate justice to be politicking such as this.


2 posted on 09/21/2005 8:14:12 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Clinton and people he appoints are exempt from normal rules. That is why one should never give them consideration or quarter. Did you hear that President Bush?


15 posted on 09/21/2005 8:18:57 PM PDT by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
"some women who might be appointed who would not advance human rights or women's rights,"

"I will take enlightenment wherever I can get it," she said. "I don't want to stop at a national boundary."

Amazing. In her list of qualifications or in her notation of her own reasoning, she never mentions the US Constitution and it's primacy for judicial qualification or judicial reasoning.

This woman should be impeached.

16 posted on 09/21/2005 8:19:24 PM PDT by keithtoo (Howard Dean is a Rove plant, Rove is a NeoCon plant, NeoCons are Trilateralist plants....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
Yes she was shooed into office even with her abysmal record as a strict de-constitutionalist by the Clitons and those stupid republicans who voted her in with an overall 90 something % approval by the Senate. By saying what she did she proves to have a bigger pair of yarbles than any of the republican senators who could not be bothered questioning her and voting against her.

Is there a third party out there for us Patriots??????
23 posted on 09/21/2005 8:21:56 PM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

It is inappropriate that a woman on the Court be promoting an individual group rather than enforcing law and the Constitution. R-B-G came onboard with the intention of implementing the Equal Rights Amendment by fiat. Based on that she is unfit to serve.


44 posted on 09/21/2005 8:34:26 PM PDT by jimfree (Freep and Ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Further confirmation from this kook Ginsberg that liberals hate traditions. I have never heard of a sitting Supreme Court Justice weighing in on who a president should select for the Supreme Court. It's an outrage.


53 posted on 09/21/2005 8:44:31 PM PDT by dennisw (If you can serve a cup of tea right, you can do anything - Gurdjieff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
"I have a list of highly qualified women, but the president has not consulted me," Ginsburg said during a brief interview Wednesday night.

Hmmmmmmm. The Constitution says the President has the power to appoint Supreme Court justices. And that the Senate must advise and consent.

But nowhere does it say that Associate Justices have any role in the appointment process. Perhaps Justice Ginsburg's copy of the Constitution reads differently than mine...?

62 posted on 09/21/2005 8:56:55 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

"It is unbecoming and improper for a sitting associate justice to be politicking such as this."

Par for the course for an ACLU/NOW-RadFem Clintonista Jurist.

She should be thankful Souter is on the court, so she escapes the 'worst Justice on the Supreme Court' label.


86 posted on 09/21/2005 9:21:30 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Ginsberg-like Clinton-spits on American Tradition. She should shut up. Justices should not be involved in politics. This woman should be impeached.


111 posted on 09/22/2005 2:24:27 AM PDT by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

No kidding. It's appalling actually. It's hard to believe this isn't against judicial ethics.


135 posted on 09/22/2005 10:07:02 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

And she cares?

She is a liberal witch.


141 posted on 09/22/2005 10:25:31 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

166 posted on 09/26/2005 7:25:52 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson