To: Crackingham
"There are "some women who might be appointed who would not advance human rights or women's rights," It is not a judge's job to advance rights. This remark should disqualify her immediately.
10 posted on
09/21/2005 8:18:12 PM PDT by
WarPaint
(Crush Islam)
To: WarPaint
Exactly.
Ruthie is a partisan hack. Pubbies should have filibustered her.
60 posted on
09/21/2005 8:54:40 PM PDT by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: WarPaint
That was my exact reaction. That one sentence says it all.
100 posted on
09/21/2005 9:44:35 PM PDT by
Mr. Rational
(God gave me a brain and expects me to use it)
To: WarPaint
""There are "some women who might be appointed who would not advance human rights or women's rights,"
It is not a judge's job to advance rights. This remark should disqualify her immediately."
___________________________________
Agreed!
125 posted on
09/22/2005 8:01:57 AM PDT by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson