Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F16Fighter
Does a true "conservative" let CFR slide through his hands without a veto?

Does a true "conservative" allow the massive Mexican invasion to continue unabated -- especially after 9/11?

Does a true conservative over-spend on social programs?

Does a true conservative grow the government?

Does a true conservative back the liberal Arlen Specter over a conservative Pat Toomey in a tight Senatorial race?

This is interesting, F16, because I disagree with what the President has done on almost all of these issues.

What you are demanding is that everything the President does is agreeable to all conservatives for him to be called a conservative by you.

On the other hand, I do not expect more of President Bush than I did of President Reagan, and know that it is not possible for a man to be President and stay conservative in every single decision. Sometimes compromises are made. Sometimes mistakes are made (big miscalculations, like CFR).

The difference between us doesn't seem to be so much in our political views, but in our expectations of what a human being who has an inordinate amount of pressure on him from all sides, can realistically do.

For me, the strength of the military, and American sovereignty abroad, the protection of this country against terror, the strong, unflagging stand on moral issues, and the incredible moves toward Constitution-honoring judges, more than compensate for the signing of CFR.

This is a conservative President. In the same sense as Reagan was......wherever it was possible, but not perfectly so. And in my view, conservatives who openly fight against him, are hurting the conservative cause by splintering and whining and criticizing when we should be supporting him against an extremely evil political foe.

I choose to fight the left. You choose to fight the President.

735 posted on 09/24/2005 12:27:40 PM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 730 | View Replies ]


To: ohioWfan
"This is interesting, F16, because I disagree with what the President has done on almost all of these issues."

(Knocked over with a feather)

"What you are demanding is that everything the President does is agreeable to all conservatives for him to be called a conservative by you....

On the other hand, I do not expect more of President Bush than I did of President Reagan, and know that it is not possible for a man to be President and stay conservative in every single decision. Sometimes compromises are made. Sometimes mistakes are made (big miscalculations, like CFR). "

Rather I am "demanding" the President at minimum hold the hold on conservative tenets. I understand compromises must be made and negotiated, but Dubya's cumulative conservative "achievements" have simply not met the standards expected -- not only from me -- but from many conservative Republicans.

"The difference between us doesn't seem to be so much in our political views, but in our expectations of what a human being who has an inordinate amount of pressure on him from all sides, can realistically do."

Agreed, but handling that "pressure from all sides" is what leadership is all about, and adhering to principle in the face of it.

"For me, the strength of the military, and American sovereignty abroad, the protection of this country against terror, the strong, unflagging stand on moral issues, and the incredible moves toward Constitution-honoring judges, more than compensate for the signing of CFR."

Mixed bag here, OWF...

Dubya's display of inspiration and "strength of military," his stand against the WoT, his stand on moral issues are all admiral achievements....

However the domestic sovereignty issue -- his lack of border enforcement and undercutting the WoT -- is HUGELY undermining "leadership" in what should be a no-brainer.

As far as judicial appointments, Dubya has been s-l-o-w. And he should have tossed EVERY SINGLE ONE of Bubba judicial and administrative personel out on their keister -- just the way Bubba had done with Bush 41's personel.

"In my view, conservatives who openly fight against him, are hurting the conservative cause by splintering and whining and criticizing when we should be supporting him against an extremely evil political foe.

I choose to fight the left. You choose to fight the President."

The President was rewarded with my support of him in the last two elections.

OWF, I reckon our differences are in whether or not the President needs OR should be taken to task for bad policy, and that opinion voiced.

The President shall continue to get my support on an issue by issue basis, and criticized when he is wrong...

In the meantime, the Left is ALWAYS wrong, therfore we shall continue to fight them together.

739 posted on 09/24/2005 2:15:30 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 735 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson