You're absolutely one of THE least politically savvy people on FR; bar none. You may have been a member here for an extremely long time, but I have yet to see you make a single wise/correct/well thought out post in your entire posting career here.
I mean, you just seem to be slamming the person, not arguing a point.
It is best, when new, to read far more than one posts, get to know the people here, and to stay out of what doesn't concern you. And I was, actually, arguing a point; one which was abysmally ignorant.
Nopardons seems a little worked up, probably because he knows he couldn't be more wrong.
To be president it's often said, the candidate should have fire in his belly. A nonchalant attitude, like his dad's sneaking a look at his watch, costing us the election, just doesn't fly.
Being a part time wimp, like cuddling up to Teddy Kennedy or Bill Clinton or CARE, should make conservatives shudder. Like Ann, I want a president that pushes the parties platform, that uses all our hard earned advantages, and not be held back by his handlers (Rove IMO).
Signing the campaign finance reform really put a blemish on his legacy. After all, if a Republican president, with mandate to spare, doesn't defend the constitution, who ever will in the future?
Like Rush says, the truth is hard too take, and that's what nopardons is wrestling with.