Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl; Czar

You need to read the info about Prop 76 also.
I find it very interesting that the leftists are strongly against Prop 76 and so are the two of you.

Birds of a feather?

PROPOSITION 76

STATE SPENDING AND SCHOOL FUNDING LIMITS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

Limits state spending to prior year’s level plus three previous years’ average revenue growth.
Changes state minimum school funding requirements (Proposition 98); eliminates repayment requirement when minimum funding suspended.
Excludes appropriations above the minimum from schools’ funding base.
Directs excess General Fund revenues, currently directed to schools/tax relief, to budget reserve, specified construction, debt repayment.
Permits Governor, under specified circumstances, to reduce appropriations of Governor’s choosing, including employee compensation/state contracts.
Continues prior year appropriations if state budget delayed.
Prohibits state special funds borrowing.
Requires payment of local government mandates.
SUMMARY OF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S ESTIMATE OF NET STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FISCAL IMPACT:

The provisions creating an additional state spending limit and granting the Governor new power to reduce spending in most program areas would likely reduce expenditures relative to current law. These reductions also could apply to schools and shift costs to other local governments.
The new spending limit could result in a smoother pattern of state expenditures over time, especially to the extent that reserves are set aside in good times and available in bad times.
The provisions changing school funding formulas would make school and community college funding more subject to annual decisions of state policymakers and less affected by a constitutional funding guarantee.
Relative to current law, the measure could result in a change in the mix of state spending—that is, some programs could receive a larger share and others a smaller share of the total budget.


http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/index.shtml


49 posted on 09/24/2005 5:21:20 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
The measure has some positives... it also has some negatives. I oppose more borrowing.

LAO:

This measure:...

• Requires the payment of settle-up obligations for years prior to 2004-05 to be paid within 15 years.

• Converts the 2005-06 outstanding maintenance factor to a one-time obligation that is required to be paid within 15 years.


52 posted on 09/24/2005 5:39:21 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson