Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bar-Face
You ask very deep questions, Grasshopper.

First we must realize that our scientists have been very wrong about the sun. It is cold and frozen on the inside, like Jupiter. As the cold and frozen central mass of hydrogen and helium effervesces, the gasses slowly permeate to the top under great pressure, serving as an ultimate insulation for thousands of miles, behaving as it were like a cold, thick, dark blanket. We have 3 pieces of proof for this: 1. The surface rotates faster at the equator then it does toward the poles ... not possible with a gas cloud. 2. They can compute the appearance of the far side of the sun using sound waves measured on the near side, which originated on the far side, which is only possible where the gas through which the sound passes is very, very cold. And 3, the very high magnification, high resolution images of the sun's surface show the sun's combustion process to be very specifically localized to the surface. Something burning inside and escaping through the surface would appear to be blowing the surface off, not combusting there.

Anyway, if you are still with me, this surface combustion is what is sensitive to strong electromagnetic fields and incident solar radiation being reflected. With a reflector not too dissimilar to the one in the previous post, it is possible to glance a beam of reflected light off the surface and toward earth, giving the appearance of a solar flare at the edge of the solar disk. Like a rock thrown into a dish of burning gasoline it causes a spectacular interruption in the delicate balance of effervescence and combustion. A 0.05 percent boost in the solar output is well within Halliburton's margin of error.
58 posted on 09/21/2005 4:13:14 PM PDT by Sundog (Cheers -- where would we be without Junk Science?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Sundog
Damn! I knew it. Halliburton again.
Sundog, you are one smart puppy. You figgered it out.

Next question:
I know that Dick Cheney started Halliburton back in the mid 20th century so he and his cronies could rule the world, but how did they get so many Democrats to go along with them back in the 90s? The 70s? The 60s?
And and just how old was Dick Cheney when he started Halliburton so he could rule the world? he mustard been a child prodigy. Or at least a smart little bugger.
90 posted on 09/22/2005 5:51:21 AM PDT by Bar-Face (The Embassy helicopter is warming up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson