Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy

No, it was most definitely not illegal. That was made abundantly clear in the hearing today.

There were two sets of input data. One was purely public domain, readily available info purchased from a private corporation.

The other set was a combination of that info and classified info. That data was only handled by intel people, whereas the other set (pubic info only) was handled by both intel people and private contractors.

Data mining itself is not illegal. The debate today largely centered around the relationship of data mining to Posse Comitatus, and there was no testimony brought forth that suggested a violation of law.


69 posted on 09/21/2005 7:01:22 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (Stop the looting! The IRS hates competition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ovrtaxt
"The debate today largely centered around the relationship of data mining to Posse Comitatus, and there was no testimony brought forth that suggested a violation of law."

No testimony "brought forth." Did they ask the right questinos?

"Intel people"

Were those "Intel people" "intel people" associated with military intelligence branches?

Illegal. And I bet the "wall" between private and "intel" was not as strong as Gorelick's.

81 posted on 09/21/2005 7:36:03 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson