The press knows that this all points to Clinton.
I don't understand why Rummy is blocking witnesses, though.
So the only MSM coverage will be about the blocking and not about the fact that the data was deleted in May or June of 2000.
It may be due to the sensitive nature of sources and methods used to develop the info. What I don't see in any of the articles is whether the Pentagon is refusing to send witnesses outright, or just refusing to send witnesses to an open session. I'm willing to bet heavily on the latter.
It is impossible to comprehend the pro-Clinton actions this Administration has taken. Prior to the Able Danger stonewall, the biggest outrage was the wristslap for the Sandy Berger's felony action...theft and falsifying government records, obstruction of justice (impeding an ivestigation), and possible conspiracy. Had Berger done this in 1952 relating to covering up the causes of a Soviet attack he may well have been executed. (The second biggest outrage was killing the video evidence in the David Rosen case, which shocked even the judge and led to an easy, Hillary-saving, aquittal.)
I don't care what is in those FBI files. I don't care if Alberto Gonzales was a transvestite, or there is evidence Rummy pulled someone's head off in a bar brawl. No personal secrets justify the insanity of protecting the left-wing maniacs whose malfeasance and extreme adherence to "civil rights" dogma nurtured and strengthened Al Queda and led us directly to 9/11.
Mr Bush: Stop protecting the Clintons. Please let America know the full truth. The Clintons were responsible for 9/11. Is is historical fact.
"Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, said that the Defense Department had a representative at the hearing and that it had provided sufficient information to committee members."
STICK A FORK IN YOU, Bryan!
Because some DoD attorneys are dirty. Maybe others over at the Pentagon as well.
Rummy is not blocking witnesses, Fox News (Brit Hume's show) just did a recap. Evidently there are aspects of this that are classified and Rumsfeld offered to have closed hearings on AD...but he was turned down. I hope they still have them..we may get a watered down version of what went on but it will have enough visibility by those who can correct these things...and it would still be enough to nail the 911 commission (IMHO)
Speculation on my part but by blocking public testimony he guarantees the media will be jumping on this story.
The media may actually do their job and start asking some questions.