Is it possible that Bush (Rove?) is trying to create the suspicion that there is something damaging to the CURRENT administration, so that the Democrats and the media will begin to clamour, as the always do, for more information, sensing that they can damage Bush?
Then, when everything comes to light, no doubt revealing the culpability of the Clinton administration, it will have been brought to the fore by the Democrats' zeal to "get Bush" and cannot be painted as an attempt by Bush to "get Clinton".
If so, I say BRILLIANT!, BRILLIANT!
Is this possible?
Brilliant is my way of saying " I Hope So "
I would like to attempt to answer the question as to why our Department of Defense, currently under Donald Rumsfeld, would want to stonewall this committee.
Althought no one believes it yet, it all ties together.
The 90's had a rather large number of conspiracy theory type events. Let's focus on TWO: OKC and TWA800.
In OKC, dozens of witnesses saw McVeigh and Nichols with IRAQI GULF WAR I defectors with millins of $$ from a rich uncle in Bagdad. These people signed sworn depositions admitted into court and documented by Jayna Davis.
In TWA800 hundreds of people saw a missle(s) shoot down an airliner near Long Island. HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE. The NY TIMES doesn't interview a single witness, not one. The witnesses take out a full page ad and ask what the h^&^* is going on, how come they will not tell the truth? Jack Cashill documents all this and more.
THERE"S nothing complicated about these events EXCEPT the government investigations were full of lies. YOU should be asking WHY?
http://www.twa800.com/eyewitnesses.htm
We attack Iraq for reasons which seem to be vague even if you support this administration.
We watch Clinton's national security advisor Sandy Berger get caught stuffing TOP SECRET SPECIAL CATAGORY documents in his underwear.
We watch Jamie GORELICK stay on the 9/11 investigation even thought she was involved with OKC, TWA800 investigation, a wall between intelligence and law enforcement which had one of the high jacker's computers weeks before the terror attack etc.
And then you wonder WHY BUSH's administration still tries to obstruct the investigation into ABLLE DANGER?
The fact is: CLINTON obstructed the investigations in the 90's as they were terrorist attacks on the UNITED STATES and supported by the IRAQI Govenment. Jack Cashill has summarized these investigations as political decisions by Clinton. If not for 9/11, no one would have known WHY lies were turned into truth.
Terrorism made Clinton's re-election complicated so Bill CLinton did what Clinton does best, he lied, NO TERRORISM by Presidential Decree.
Since the MSM hasn't told you and everybody else on FreeRepublic, DU and everywhere else, you wonder what the h*^^. AS I've explained, it's very eaay to understand if you'll just think independently of the MSM and these fairy tales like the 9/11 Commission generated.
Clinton knows the BUSH administration is NOT going to really investigate all this. It would destroy our form of "not so democratic, not so representative government."
The people would want some heads, wouldn't they? They aren't going there without a fight.
Now, you don't believe much of the above, do you?
I bet you still haven'd figured yet that LBJ and HOOVER killed JFK. And the reason they won't tell you? The lies are too deep, they cross both parties. And with JFK as a template, they can tell the idiots in the press just about anything. Watch the JFK specials on the history channel where they won't SHOW the "GUILTY MEN" because it fingers LBJ and HOOVER.
We will protect the office of the Presidency at all costs, even if people jump off buildings to their deaths.
And they aren't going to tell you about Clinton either.