Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded

I agree.

Only the feds would think its a good idea to step in and insure where private insurers refused to go, which is why there is a fed flood insurance program.

The MS ag might as well sue the feds claiming that people are covered whether they had flood insuance or not. It makes about as much sense.

Wait...he might just try that....


21 posted on 09/21/2005 10:08:59 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Adder
Only the feds would think its a good idea to step in and insure where private insurers refused to go, which is why there is a fed flood insurance program.

In California, the gov't does earthquake insurance.

28 posted on 09/21/2005 10:10:43 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson