Absolutely correct.
This is a simple case of Christians versus Muslims at the very bottom of it all. The UN backs the P.R.O.P.* {Phony Religion Of Peace} supporting likely false and spurious charges against a Christian adversary.
The Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches very rightly unify in supporting and giving sanctuary to their own...
But I guess church sanctuary is only palatable to the media if it involves revolutionary "liberation theology" marxist S. American Catholic priests giving shelter to murderous guerillas who massacred Moskito Indians and people in small villages who refused to capitulate to their terror.
One man's terrorist is ALWAYS the SlimeStreamMedia's "freedom fighter".
A.A.C.
I don't pretend to know the facts of this case ... I'm merely commenting on the propriety of the corrupt and criminal UN presuming to sit in judgement over the alleged corruption and criminality on others' back-yards. It has the same outrageous ludicriousness as Ted Kennedy presuming to sit in judgement over someone else's fitness to serve on the Supreme Court.