Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: visualops; CobaltBlue

So are they - you CobaltBlue - going to sue the barge owner for billions because their barge got away in a category 4 hurricane, damaged a levee, and flooded part of a city???


242 posted on 09/21/2005 3:19:24 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]


To: DB
This is Newsmax, but quoting a WSJ piece.

In a fact-filled retrospective that told the full story, the Wall Street Journal explained in great detail just what happened when much of the Big Easy became an adjunct of Lake Ponchartrain.

The Journal told the truth, but the truth hurts when you are seeking to put your spin on the assignment of blame. So the remainder of the media simply ignored a story the American people are entitled to know.

Facts Ignored and Not Investigated

Among the facts exposed of the Journal which the mainstream media has studiously ignored:


Point being, there were several reasons for the extensive flooding and damage. The single biggest reason IMHO is the location of the city. With that location came a responsibility of the local and state government, and it's pretty obvious there was alot of incompetance. Beyond the levees, what about pumps that didn't work? Evacuation plans not followed? When your single biggest danger is flooding, why weren't emergency supplies and generators on upper floors?
Anf for you Cobalt, what responsibility do you have when you don't leave when asked? When you continually elect corrupt legislators? When you trash your own town and hinder rescue efforts? Like the personal injury lawyer on TV here, when your goal in life seems to be to always expect someone else to "hep you get your check"?
243 posted on 09/21/2005 3:35:37 AM PDT by visualops (www.visualops.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: DB
So are they - you CobaltBlue - going to sue the barge owner for billions because their barge got away in a category 4 hurricane, damaged a levee, and flooded part of a city???

The way a case like this works, you sue everybody, and let the court sort it all out.

The reason being, that once the case is going, you can take depositions and have experts examine things and prevent evidence from being destroyed. So, you sue them all as soon as you can.

They don't like it, but that's the way it has to be. Otherwise they destroy evidence and hide evidence and refuse to cooperate.

263 posted on 09/21/2005 9:14:59 AM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson