Posted on 09/20/2005 2:53:16 PM PDT by Gipper08
NEW YORK, Sept. 18 /PRNewswire/ -- On Thursday, President Bush delivered a speech to the nation where he pledged to "do what it takes," to rebuild the Gulf region. By late last week there were signs of renewal in New Orleans and the sounds of hammers and saws all along the coast. But Bush's new commitments, as broad and sweeping as the Mississippi River itself, could divide his own party, blast gaping holes in the federal budget and create management tasks that swamp his second-term agenda -- including the creation of a benign Iraq, reports Newsweek Chief Political Correspondent Howard Fineman in the September 27 cover, "Bush's Math: No Big Easy" (on newsstands Monday, September 19). (Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20050918/NYSU002 ) The administration now must renew its financial case for the Iraq war against the backdrop of the desperate needs of the Other Gulf, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice conceded in an interview with Newsweek. In the fall, when Congress considers military spending -- and perhaps a new special appropriation to fund the war -- the pressure will grow. "I don't doubt that we'll have to make the argument in budget time..." she said. "But I have every confidence that it's an argument that Americans will understand, resonate with." Fineman examines the political ramifications of Bush's speech and how it will affect his second-term agenda in the cover package. "I think it's the best speech he has ever given," declared Michael Oliver, the state Economic Development secretary. John Maginnis, a plugged-in Louisiana pundit, had an explanation for the official good cheer. "Everyone wants all of the money," he said. The first sign of an internecine war on the budget emerged at a recent gathering of the House Republican Conference. Rep. Mike Pence, the House's leading deficit hawk, challenged Joshua Bolten, a former Goldman Sachs banker who runs the Office of Management and Budget. There to seek a tranche of $50 billion in relief money, Bolten brushed aside the congressman's insistent fiscal questions. Pence suggested a yearlong delay in launching the Medicare drug benefit; several allies floated the idea of a 10 percent, across-the- board cut in every category of spending. No dice. Bolten agreed that spending "offsets" were a "worthy topic," but stayed mum. It was "not the time to have this debate," he told the assembled Republicans, saying the cash was needed immediately to save lives in the region. Some GOP strategists worry that the costs of Katrina -- on top of everything else -- will generate pressure, at the grassroots, to cut back support for the war in Iraq. "I'm worried about the moment when a mayor in Louisiana is told that he's not going to get his bridge or his firehouse built for two years," said a top GOP staffer in the House, declining to be named because he deals with the White House daily. "And we're going to tell him to get in line, that the money isn't there right now, and he is going to say "How come we can afford to keep rebuilding the same damned bridge in Baghdad every day and y'all can't afford to build mine?" Also in this week's cover package, Detroit Bureau Chief Keith Naughton and Investigative Correspondent Mark Hosenball report on the waves of contractors, prospectors and speculators looking to cash in on one of the largest reconstruction efforts in history. They also report on widespread snafus. In one instance, with thousands of starving animals wandering New Orleans, the federal disaster agency placed an emergency $28,370 order with PetsMart for 970 wire pet crates on September 9. The pet-supply chain jumped at the chance to help, even waiving delivery charges, a spokeswoman tells newsweek. Over four days, FEMA first changed its order, canceled it, reinstated it, put it on hold and finally demanded it. But when the PetsMart truck arrived at a New Orleans naval base Friday, it was initially turned away. When the driver finally gained entry, he drove around the base all day, racking up 152 miles, to find someone to take delivery. The tail-chasing experience left PetsMart "frustrated and disappointed." FEMA admits "kinks" in the process, but says it was its first big pet rescue. And Wall Street Editor Allan Sloan looks at how the country can pay for the reconstruction and the problems future borrowing can mean in the long- term. "Just keep on spending and borrowing, because at least for now, there's no limit to the debt that Uncle Sam can rack up with foreign and U.S. lenders," Sloan writes. "But one day, we'll have one Katrina -- or one other unexpected problem -- too many. We'll finally spook the financial markets on which we're now so dependent. Federal borrowing costs will rise, the economy will tank, we'll all be hurt. Instead of a 'perfect storm' of the physical variety, we'll have one of the financial variety. And like Katrina, it's going to be devastating." General Editor Jon Darman reports on Haley Barbour, who as governor of Mississippi, in the first long nights after Katrina, was struck by the scenes of New Orleans descending into madness and contrast with the calm he saw inside his own state. "I don't want to make comparisons," he told Newsweek, "all I'll say is we want people to know that in Mississippi, things work." A former D.C. lobbyist, now as Barbour's state looks to the Feds to cover staggering reconstruction costs, nobody is complaining about having an old Washington hand in the governor's chair. "When Haley calls Washington, there's a lot of familiarity and a lot of good will," says one close Barbour associate who asked not to be identified so as to avoid drawing attention from the governor.
Cut ALL the pork out of the budget and it would rebuild two New Orleans. Nothing so hard about that math.
HAHAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laugh. Nice tag line, by the way...another snicker!
Reagan's economists never said that and actually disavow it in their writings, but since the claim gets endlessly repeated by radio hosts and FReepers I guess it has achieved the political version of urban myth. The only case where revenue actually increased was with the capital gains reductions. In all other cases revenue simply didn't fall as much as predicted by static analysis, some 2/3 of each dollar cut being recouped from economic growth. Which is what the Reagan economists expected and predicted.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.