Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question_Assumptions

You can't derive history from structure. You can reasonably speculate that if you know the history of object A, and you find an object B that is very similar, then you know something about the history of B.

Interestingly, this is how Darwin derived the rules for natural selection. He spoke with large numbers of animal and plant breeders, noted the history of domesticated plants and animals, and speculated that the same rules of design and manufacture apply to all living things. The difference being that "wild" nature is a lot more wasteful and ruthless in pruning its populations.


944 posted on 09/22/2005 7:53:46 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
You can't derive history from structure.

Then what are those rovers trying to do on Mars? Then what are these researchers trying to do?

948 posted on 09/22/2005 8:16:03 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
You can't derive history from structure.

Heck, what are whole fields of science including archaeology, geology, paleoclimatology, the oil exploration mentioned earlier, etc. doing, then?

954 posted on 09/22/2005 8:30:13 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson