Gee, I always thought that creationists belived in the literal meaning of The Book of Genisis whereas MOST people who don't believe in Darwin's theory advocated Intelligent Design, but why bother making that distinction? They're all just a bunch of crazy Bible thumping fundamentalists who want to take us back to the 1700's, right?
although almost half believe that Darwin has been proved right, slightly more disagree.
Sure he was proven right! It's not like his finches have hybridized from 14 to 6, right? Oh, they did? Well, at least we have fosil evidence that traces man back to apes. We don't? Oh... Well, at least there's evidence of one species evolving from another and that by logical extention- oh, we don't have that either? Well, let's just shout them down then.
Owl_Eagle(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
"Well, let's just shout them down then."
Lots of that from both sides of the argument. I don't have any use for any of those folks.
Pretty much. You seem to be on the road yourself.
It's not like his finches have hybridized from 14 to 6, right?
Huh? 14 what to 6 what?
Well, at least we have fosil evidence that traces man back to apes. We don't?
Well, at least there's evidence of one species evolving from another and that by logical extention- oh, we don't have that either?
Is the Platypus evidence of a beaver evolving into a duck, or a duck evolving into a beaver?
Do you have anything to say that isn't factually wrong?
And don't forget the hand-waving. Gotta have that.
lol had to laugh at your post.. but... please don't confuse the Elite know it alls with facts.
It makes their heads hurt and pisses them off that you won't squeeze yourself into their neat little "Scientific Universe"
Grand response Owl :)