Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest; edsheppa
Setting in motion a chain of events that results in something happening is not the same as designing the outcome.

Who says you had to design every outcome of a process, in order to be credited with designing that process?

I can play the semantics games just as well as you can,

Substantially better, I would say, from this example.

but they're not the same thing.

So...may I take it that since the people who build computers don't build the programs that run on computers, that computers aren't designed?

1,191 posted on 09/26/2005 1:20:55 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies ]


To: donh
So...may I take it that since the people who build computers don't build the programs that run on computers, that computers aren't designed?

Of course the computers are designed. But the programs aren't designed by the people who design the computers.

1,195 posted on 09/26/2005 1:28:53 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies ]

To: donh; inquest
Who says you had to design every outcome of a process, in order to be credited with designing that process?

Just as a for instance, I am a programmer and have created many programs and sometimes there are bugs, some bad enough to corrupt a user's data I'm ashamed to say. I don't think there's any rational way to consider those bugs my design and yet also no rational way to consider the programs that contain them undesigned.

1,198 posted on 09/26/2005 1:38:51 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson