To: Right Wing Professor
A thing is a science if enough scientists concede it is
Well I'm not mad at least not yet. I agree with TaxRelief that lots of the science in evolution is bunk, and one of the other posters here one your side just admitted that science is a 'closed shop'
What an asinine statement, given (for example) the massive amount of genomic information available, and the fact it completely supports evolution.
Your conclusion that the 'evidence completely supports evolution' reveals an attitude a bias of you and your club, and in fact diminishes you as a scientist, the surface has yet even begun to be scratched
Rather than see yet more evidence to fill in the gaps of your pre-ordained conclusion that evolution is the answer. I (and maybe others) see that we are beginning to see (within the limits of out perception) the makings of something great and wonderful & thats beyond our comprehension.
Wolf
1,145 posted on
09/24/2005 8:45:29 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(U.S. Army Veteran.....75-78)
To: RunningWolf; Right Wing Professor
A thing is a science if enough scientists concede it is
Well I'm not mad at least not yet. I agree with TaxRelief that lots of the science in evolution is bunk, and one of the other posters here one your side just admitted that science is a 'closed shop'
So...your latest manipulative trick is to refuse to post to me, but instead, argue with me while posting to someone else. You're quite the little trickster.
You are absolutely right about science being a closed shop--it is only open to people who can and do read and publish in scientific journals, and the opinions of those who don't even try are not taken into any serious scientific account, unless they threaten scientists with bodily harm under color of law, as in Galileo's trial, or Bruno's burning.
1,149 posted on
09/24/2005 11:36:18 PM PDT by
donh
(A is </a>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson