Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYP: CORNERING KOREA - But don't expect much (Kerry was proven wrong again)
New York Post ^ | September 20, 2005 | John Podhoretz

Posted on 09/20/2005 5:25:41 AM PDT by OESY

...The president called it a "positive step" and not much more, pointing out that "the question is, over time, will all parties adhere to the agreement."

Translation: I'm not betting the ranch on this one holding up.

Even so, what happened here is a stunning and unexpected vindication of the Bush administration approach to the North Korean problem. The famously go-it-alone, unilateralist United States has spent three years working with five other nations to bring North Korea to its senses.

This approach was treated with withering scorn by Democrats last year, in particular by John Kerry, who described the Bush policy as "one of the greatest abdications of foreign policy that I've seen in all the years that I've been in the Senate. . . . They've handled it miserably. Abysmally."

Kerry and other Democrats wanted to give the North Koreans what they wanted — to treat them as though they were the Soviet Union reborn and negotiate with them one-on-one. "We should have been engaged in bilateral negotiations from the get-go, from the beginning," he said in 2003. "And it was obvious that when you announce a policy of pre-emption and you invade another country, and you begin to build bunker-busting nuclear weapons, that Kim Jong Il was going to find a way to get the attention of this administration and he did."

Kerry's contention that the Bush administration's conduct somehow caused the North Koreans to abrogate its 1994 deal with the United States was contemptibly absurd. The CIA was warning as early as 1995 that the North Koreans were violating the "agreed framework" the Clinton administration had worked out with Pyongyang. By 1999, Clinton's onetime defense secretary, William Perry, declared: "What they're doing is moving forward on their nuclear weapons."...

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: christopherhill; clinton; kerry; northkorea; nuclear

1 posted on 09/20/2005 5:25:43 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY

JK: "I was for the unilateralist strategy before I was against the unilateralist strategy.


2 posted on 09/20/2005 5:33:54 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

They basically walked out of the room after the talks and stated that they expect us to give them nuclear reactors- deal is over already.


3 posted on 09/20/2005 5:36:24 AM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
You can't negotiate sh*t with the North Korean communists, they are liars and will back out of any deal they make as soon as they can make up new demands they know we won't agree to.
4 posted on 09/20/2005 6:18:18 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Kerry's "all my years" add up to 1 & 1/2.


5 posted on 09/20/2005 6:51:19 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson