To: gobucks
The Left's rejection of truth and moral absolutes have left them with no leg to stand on. All they can say about Intelligent Design is they think its premises contradict science. But post-modern epistemology says truth is relative and that its culturally bound. So it doesn't matter what people believe in because every person has to figure that out for themselves. There are rational arguments to make against ID but the Left won't make them for then they'd have to give their post-modernist dogma. And they show no signs of doing so.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
31 posted on
09/19/2005 7:08:44 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
And so, instead of a weapon which helps them, it becomes to them a sword of damocles...; maybe that metaphor is a stretch...
32 posted on
09/19/2005 7:18:58 PM PDT by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/Laocoon.htm)
To: goldstategop
The Left's rejection of truth and moral absolutes have left them with no leg to stand on. All they can say about Intelligent Design is they think its premises contradict science. But post-modern epistemology says truth is relative and that its culturally bound. So it doesn't matter what people believe in because every person has to figure that out for themselves. There are rational arguments to make against ID but the Left won't make them for then they'd have to give their post-modernist dogma. And they show no signs of doing so. I don't know if the author is a leftist or not, but I think you missed an essential aspect of this article: The article assumes that postmodernist epistemology is a bad thing.
54 posted on
09/19/2005 10:46:07 PM PDT by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING NOW: Seeing What's Next by Christensen, et.al.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson