Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
"and the small suits of clothes and armour in museums."

Most Armor that survived the medieval era would have had to been well taken care of, I.e. Most likely ceremonial and as such smaller then the norm for most armor of it's time. Ceremonial armor tends to be smaller because of cost.

8 posted on 09/19/2005 3:59:10 PM PDT by Post-Neolithic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Post-Neolithic
Ceremonial armor tends to be smaller because of cost.

I supposed the guy wearing the armor for ceremonial kind of stooped over for ceremony and stood tall for war.

31 posted on 09/19/2005 4:46:44 PM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Post-Neolithic

Yeah, but the armor of Henry VIII is awfully small. Why I don't know, because the royal family could eat well if anyone could.

I think there may have been two races of men. Large (Viking & nobles size--larger fighters tended to survive) and small (peasant size)


87 posted on 09/19/2005 8:56:20 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Post-Neolithic

wouldn't ceremonial armour also tend to be armour of the way high ups in the aristocracy, who wouldn't have had the armour comissioned until they were in their seat of power and were older? i've noticed that people tend to shrink as they get older, which may be a contributing factor.


120 posted on 09/20/2005 7:26:55 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson