To: ml1954
... where you refused to concede
***And I still refuse to concede that point. I see a scientific controversy raging around global warming and one around the safe levels of radioactivity and another around how much milk we should drink and one around crevo. The milk guys don't expect you to know the finer points of endocrinology of lactose intolerance in order to engage in discussion.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1470906/posts
141 posted on
09/20/2005 4:15:05 PM PDT by
Kevin OMalley
(No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
To: Kevin OMalley
The subject is the TOE, remember.
Which you have repeatedly called a religion. You have said it is dangerous.
And at the same time you claim there is a controversy about it 'raging' in the 'scientific community' when 99+% of scientists support it, fully, and oppose the teaching of ID because it isn't science. But you don't want to get into the 'science' part of it.
You are irrational or disingenuous or both.
144 posted on
09/20/2005 4:51:10 PM PDT by
ml1954
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson