Your logic does no disrespect to me, only to yourself; when you use an example of a proven theory vs. a debunked one to elevate an unproven one over an unproven one. There is no proof of evolution - there is alot of inference - but no proof.
At it's peak nearly 100% of scientist acknowledged the earth was flat, that did not make it so.
Since a preponderance of academia voted for John Kerry, I guess I should have too.
True statement. It applies to all of science.
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution
There are no 100% proofs in science, only evidences to support theories, and no evidence has been found that falsifies evolution. The range of evidence supporting evolution is immense - that is why the scientific community accepts it.
If someone wishes to challenge a theory, the proper forum for it is through science research, submission of papers for peer review, subsequent citation of papers, testing of the theory, then acceptance of it. Backhanded attempts to influence the politics of local schoolboards is not a proper forum to advance a scientific theory.