Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

From this post, you have declared that you do not believe science, you do not understand science, and if you did it wouldn't matter anyway.
***Wow, nice straw argumentation, Coyoteman. Now, instead of arguing against the straw position, why don't you argue against what I really said and stop putting words in my keyboard?


If this is the case, why should anyone who comes from the science side of the argument listen to a thing you have to say?
***Ok, we're in good shape then, because this is not the case. But if it were the case, I see your plan amounts to just not listenining. Ok, that's a good plan, very good plan, just ignore that large majority of voters & policy makers and continue on with what you were doing, make no attempt to engage in educating the masses, go ahead, go ahead....


106 posted on 09/20/2005 9:25:23 AM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Kevin OMalley
From this post, you have declared that you do not believe science, you do not understand science, and if you did it wouldn't matter anyway.

***Wow, nice straw argumentation, Coyoteman. Now, instead of arguing against the straw position, why don't you argue against what I really said and stop putting words in my keyboard?

If this is the case, why should anyone who comes from the science side of the argument listen to a thing you have to say?

***Ok, we're in good shape then, because this is not the case. But if it were the case, I see your plan amounts to just not listenining. Ok, that's a good plan, very good plan, just ignore that large majority of voters & policy makers and continue on with what you were doing, make no attempt to engage in educating the masses, go ahead, go ahead....


My comments were in response to your post #62.

Every time someone brings up science you turn it to a question of public or social policy. You consistently duck the science questions.

I think you actually explained the reason in another post:

I am trying to stay away from the scientific end of this argument for the same reason that I stayed away for 7 years: It's too acrimonious, requires too much time/knowledge/digging/etc, and I see very little ROI for myself [from your post #76].

So, now where is my lead statement (repeated again below) wrong?

From this post, you have declared that you do not believe science, you do not understand science, and if you did it wouldn't matter anyway.

110 posted on 09/20/2005 9:58:31 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Is this a good tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson