How do you know there were terrorists and not authentic police mad at the journalist?
Because they murdered him by shooting him multiple times with an automatic weapon, for the crime of marrying a woman.
Either you just said that its OK for people to shoot people for no reason, in which case the two British guys have done no wrong in your eyes, or you just said that the local police can't be trusted and the two British shouldn't have been left with them. Or maybe even both.
You've twisted and turned throughout this thread so much that you've actually managed to negate your original premise. I don't think i've ever seen anyone defeat their own argument before. Good effort.