To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; SeaLion; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis
| FutureTechPing! |
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop. |
|
|
|
16 posted on
09/20/2005 6:52:43 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
17 posted on
09/20/2005 6:54:11 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: AntiGuv
Why can't those umbilical cords be sold by the woman who gave birth? It's her tissue. It was thrown away in the past because it had no value, but now it has considerable value. So why not recognize it as her property? It might help to pay for at least some of the cost of the delivery. I don't see any ethical issues that could interfere with this. It's not as if she's selling her baby's tissue.
18 posted on
09/20/2005 7:02:29 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
To: AntiGuv
Thanks for ping. Great article!
20 posted on
09/20/2005 10:47:44 PM PDT by
SeaLion
("Belief in a cruel God makes a cruel man" -- Thomas Paine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson