Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can this man save the world? (fuel saving Hydrogen Generating Module)
The Gazette (canada.com) ^ | 9/17/05 | WILLIAM MARSDEN

Posted on 09/18/2005 7:52:36 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: ChildOfThe60s

Sorry, this is pure hokum:
there are certain properties of water, and hydrogen, that require that huge amounts of energy be expended in dissociating water into O2 and H2 - just about exactly the amount of energy produced in burning or otherwise reacting H2, e.g. fuel cell, etc. But the dissociation is not a perfectly efficient process, nor is the generation of electricity (50% - 70% efficient?).

So what you have here is a perpetual motion machine, one that would produce energy in reacting hydrogen, use some of that energy to produce hydrogen, and still have some energy left over to produce useful work?!?

Nice try.


41 posted on 09/18/2005 9:29:11 PM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper

A gallon of water weighs about 8.39 lbs.; the mw of the hydrogen is about 1/32 that of an equivalent amount of oxygen so its weight can be no more than 1/4 lbs.

Since hydrogen has 1.22 times the BTU/lbs as gasoline and it takes 4.8 lbs H2O to get 1 lbs of hydrogen, then a car with an onboard separator could theoretically go from 30 MPG to 36 MPG; now if the water supply has to be replenished every 80 miles on their test vehicle it must have a tank for the distilled water with a capacity of 11 gallons which will be consumed every 2.2 hours at 60 MPH.


42 posted on 09/18/2005 9:30:48 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

No. I find it typical of such claims.


43 posted on 09/18/2005 9:31:37 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Chaos.


44 posted on 09/18/2005 9:32:07 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Williams doesn't want to make money just through selling H2N-Gen units. He has his eye on getting a share of the fuel savings.

In other words, he would hope to install the H2N-Gen unit in, say, every Canadian National railway and truck engine for free in return for a percentage of CN's fuel savings.

Furthermore, he would hope to get his hands on carbon credits promised by the Kyoto Protocol. The trade in carbon credits is predicted to be a multi-billion-dollar business as countries attempt to meet their 2012 obligations of cutting greenhouse gases to below 1990 levels. Those who fail to make the cuts will be fined or will have to buy credits from companies that have cut well below the agreed levels.
I find that to be most interesting in all the article.
45 posted on 09/18/2005 9:33:35 PM PDT by Brian328i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
This may not be all that far-fetched. The injection of stoichiometric mix of H2 and O2, while not contributing significantly to the overall energy content of the fuel input, could nevertheless contribute majorly to the efficient burning of the gasoline.

Sort of like an enzyme facilitates a chemical reaction and is consumed in the process.

46 posted on 09/18/2005 9:34:17 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s


Do you want fries with that?


47 posted on 09/18/2005 9:36:02 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Customers who purchased this product also purchased:

The super micro solar panel that keeps your car battery at peak charge.

The adhesive backed plastic film antenna that makes your cell phone work anywhere.


48 posted on 09/18/2005 9:39:59 PM PDT by Amish with an attitude (An armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

Boy, I blew the math on that one; it will take 33 times as much water as gasoline to increase the MPG from 30 to 36 for a water tank of roughly 70 gallons of water assuming the added energy is from the combustion of the hydrogen.

My first post was assuming the use of hydrogen alone.


49 posted on 09/18/2005 9:44:12 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
scratchin my head here:

which is it?

this ?

"Williams claims he has achieved this with his H2N-Gen. His product, he said, produces a more complete burn, greatly increasing efficiency and reducing fuel consumption by 10 to 40 per cent - and pollutants by up to 100 per cent.

or this ?

The Gazette drove a 2000 six-cylinder Jeep Grand Cherokee equipped with an H2N-Gen prototype from Montreal to Cornwall and back. We set the cruise control at 102 kilometres per hour. The trip computer indicated that on the highway the car averaged about nine litres per 100 kilometres, which is more than 10 per cent below the manufacturer's mileage rating of 10.5. The combined city/highway mileage was slightly more than 11; the car is rated at 12.9.
50 posted on 09/18/2005 9:51:54 PM PDT by stylin19a (In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver
Enzymes
51 posted on 09/18/2005 9:54:05 PM PDT by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BlueSky194

Blue
I work for one of those oil companies and it is simple supply and demand. How can you say otherwise?? Evidence of price manipulation?? Anything??


52 posted on 09/18/2005 9:56:46 PM PDT by MysticCrusader (Dead Dog Trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
"I like this better than the dead cats guy. "

I liked the one about the cow magnets better.

53 posted on 09/18/2005 10:08:39 PM PDT by de Buillion (Perspective: 1880 dead Heroes in 3 yr vs. 3589 abortions EVERY DAY , 1999, USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: solitas

I played around with disassociation. I put a couple of spark plugs in a plexiglass block. Then I ran a water in a channel between them and hooked up a distributor and coil to a electric motor.

When I fired it up and held my hand over it I could feel a fairly strong force pushing up against my hand, I guess I had some kind of plasma thing going.

Well I ceased my experiments when a 10 in. spark shot out of my other hand to the test bench, scared me pretty good.

Not sure whether I generated any hydrogen or not but it ended my bid to solve the energy problem.




54 posted on 09/18/2005 10:46:00 PM PDT by underbyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I work in Transportation. We have a huge fleet, so even tiny improvements in fuel efficency or cost will save us big bucks.
We have throughly tested every gadget and gizmo we could lay our hands on. They are all pure snake oil so far.

Our successes to date:

1. Fueling vehicles on compressed natural gas (CNG.) Works great, still way cheaper per gallon equivalent than gasoline. Vehicles are pricey, though- we have to run them a long time to recoup the cost differential, although that just got substantially shorter.
Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) would solve the range problem, but the Safety Nazis and EnviroNazis don't like LNG (never mind that it's safer than gasoline and identical to Liquid Propane (LPG)
Working on reclaiming landfill gas for fueling trash trucks- turns a waste product into low-cost fuel.

2. Inject 10% CNG into diesel engines. Works great, lowers emissions, reduces costs. High conversion cost and long payback- a wash at this point except for reduced emissions. Trucks still run on 100% diesel if necessary.

3. BioDiesel- works great as a blend with petroleum diesel (30% summer, 10% winter.) Solves lubrication problems with ultra-low sulfur "clean" diesel fuel. But still prohibitively expensive- cost has stayed ahead of rising petroleum diesel prices so far. Can be used with #2 above to reduce petroleum diesel consumption by 20-40%.

Hybrid vehicles only save fuel in start-and-stop driving, and even then they payback isn't there- you won't save enough fuel over the life of the vehicle to make up the difference in price.

We would be glad to go with Hydrogen, if somebody can figure out a cost-effective way of unlocking it from the water and a practical storage system (real bad energy density per pound with current storage systems.)


55 posted on 09/18/2005 11:23:30 PM PDT by Ostlandr (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Can this man save the world?

No.
56 posted on 09/18/2005 11:31:26 PM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billybudd

bump


57 posted on 09/18/2005 11:43:54 PM PDT by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: solitas

Water injection works, but by a different mechanism from what this guy's device supposedly does. We used water injection in aircraft engines in WWII.


58 posted on 09/18/2005 11:44:16 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: solitas
Who else remembers the 'water injection' scheme popular back in the late70's (early 80's?): drill a hole in your intake manifold and put in a water drip line? The water would be sucked into the cylinders and would disassociate in the combustion.

Actually, if you were told that by someone, they were either pulling your leg, or lying. Water injection could often help give more power, but it was because many of the engines back then had excessivly retarded ignition timing. However, if you tried increasing the timing, you would wind up with some very serious preignition. The water injection (and the ones I saw were not a drip... They had a pump that actually sprayed a mist into the carb) would cool the charge, and help prevent preignition. You could then increase the timinging lead. It also helped when you couldn't find decent premium gas.

Mark

59 posted on 09/18/2005 11:47:03 PM PDT by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Agreed. Snake oil. Is this company traded on the TSE? That would certainly explain a lot.


60 posted on 09/18/2005 11:47:09 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson