I read Mark Fuhrman's book, too, just to find out if I had my facts straight and if there were any important pieces not known to me. Fuhrman did a good job, I think -- right off the bat he said he had No Dog in that fight. He is an investigator, and a lot went uninvestigated in Terri's case. He makes a reasonable case that even though he couldn't find anyone who had a good thing to say about Michael, that doesn't mean he intentionally tried to harm her. It could have all just been a terrible accident. Furhman puts to rest that Terri wasn't a bulimic and the weight she lost was under a physician's supervision. He also does a good job developing the time line and that is what really indicts Schiavo.
Michael never tells the same story twice. So, my prediction is that he will not write a book to tell his side of the story because then it will be pinned down. He never showned up for any depositions, so why would he write a book that could later be used against him in a civil suit? The answer to that is simple. He is a sociopath and doesn't care what anyone thinks. No one is going after him, so why not Cash In!
That was the major point I picked up during my read of Fuhrman's book - that being Michael Schiavo never could stick to one story during that fateful morning. Because Furhman was able to easily point that out as a problem, that issue alone was the nail in the coffin concerning Mr. Schiavo being the suspect - in my own mind. I agree also that Schiavo will probably never relate the events of that morning in a book cuz then he would have a problem trying to cover all his stories from over the years.
"Michael never tells the same story twice."
Maybe he should write two books (or more).
They would all be lies, though.