To: wagglebee
How could that work even if that was the aim of the white racist uberlords? Water seeks its own level and therefore flooding the low-lying areas, presumably mostly black populated, would simply mean the unintentional breach against which this supposed deliberate flooding was aimed would guarantee damage to the white areas since the additional water would rise above the flooded black areas. If anything, to protect the white areas from a natural breach, you would want to keep the low-lying areas dry so they would receive the floodwater while whitey got out of town. Did Robinson ask a single one of these "reasonable" blacks how they thought the alleged plan was supposed to work? What this the WaPo's position on fact checking? Supposedly an editor or two signed off on Robinson having actual "reasonable" black sources and wasn't just pulling this out of his, er, hat.
71 posted on
09/18/2005 11:16:38 AM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." [Jay Lessig, 2/7/2005])
To: NonValueAdded
Facts, Facts, The Washington post don't need no steenkin facts.
128 posted on
09/18/2005 3:40:19 PM PDT by
rock58seg
("Guest Workers," W's version of, "Read my lips." Secure our borders!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson