[trussell]

You two think that it is only the men who can be the wealthy person coming into a marriage? Or the only one who put so much into schooling that needed to be considered?

I am the one who went to a higher learning facility...I am the one who was capable of getting the higher paying job in my last marriage. My (ex) husband worked as a trailer park maintenance man...didn't even finish school or get his GED. You two sound very bigoted against women.

[Prophet in the wilderness]

I am only against women who take men for a ride because it's a game to them, or a women who thinks it's her womanly RIGHT to take a man for all he's worth.
If I see a man who were to take advantage of a woman's finances, or take her for all she's worth, I consider that wrong also.

[thinking]

I would have to say, that it works both way...but, traditionally, mainly, the way it was...it was the male, that went into the workforce and was the "provider"...and upon the breakup of the marriage, was the spouse, that had the most to lose...

As far as your comments regarding, my objectiveness, I would suggest, that there may be 2 bigots on this forum...you and I...