I see.
And if a woman knowingly has sex with a man who has herpes, the man is responsible if she catches herpes.
A woman's ability to become pregnant is her evolutionary advantage and her responsibility to manage properly.
Of course, that would put a dent in the sexual revolution and ensuing destruction of family and marriage--and we little liberals can't let that happen, can we?
Correction, you little twit.... for two people having recreational sex, pregnancy is absolutely no advantage, but rather, a vulnerability you both share. The accidental child will have TWO parents, not just one. And even if you cry all the way home, that will still be the judgment against you.
Of course, that would put a dent in the sexual revolution and ensuing destruction of family and marriage--and we little liberals can't let that happen, can we?
Go to hell and don't talk to me about the destruction of marriage. A man with no honor, like yourself, has no standing to mourn the destruction of values he has just pissed on.
Don't post to me anymore. You'll never convince me you have one valuable thing to add. Life's too short for you.
I hope you're having fun.
You've angered both traditional friend and foe of mine here.
I'll confess pardner, while you may mean well....your sexual realpolitik stuff is just a bit over the top.
Most of us transcend our anthropological limitations on occasion.
A real man is responsible for his spawn even if he despises the mother.
I know....I've been doing that for 12 years now and I really really loathe her.
Too many irresponsible men screwing around with irresponsible women has decimated some cultures in the west....and it's harmed society overall demonstrably.
I think men should be daddies and women should be mommies and really don't care about modern logic.