http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1471551/posts
But even before you an TAdams8591 got into it, you posted this to Crackingham:
To: Crackingham
And yet we had freepers on this very forum who were all upset at Judge Roberts providing a few hours pro bono work for a gay rights matter.
Some day a certain segment of the conservative party is going to "get it" and understand they don't speak for all conservatives and that Republicans are the big tent party.
6 posted on 08/26/2005 5:46:51 PM CDT by Peach
So you apparently are saying you are a fiscal conservative, but not a social conservative. That's where you and I are finding our disagreement. I categorize those who are not social conservatives as moderates. A conservative is one who is conservative through and through, without distinguishing fiscal from social.
But it gave me a good laugh to read your discussion with TAdams8591 on that thread. You made false charges and refused to answer specific questions there, too. It seems to be your MO. Attack and refuse to answer questions.
Oh, this is getting better and better. More false and nutty assumptions on your part. LOL
So because I defended Judge Roberts doing pro bono work for a gay rights group, which he explained during the hearings that he has NEVER, ever once refused anyone pro bono work, you ASSUME I am a social conservative? LOLOL
You sound like a homophobe. How's that for an assumption? See how that works?
As far as your other comment about an interaction I had with someone and I didn't answer a question, if you honestly think I'm going to wade through 200 and more posts on one thread looking for what you are referring to, you're out of your mind.
And hon, you are the one who made false charges and can't back them up and now pretend you were talking about the future. Hah!