Replies

This is becoming like a bad episode of XFiles or something.

I said, "I am far from alone is deciding that if these two issues are not being serviced, then it gives me less than sufficient reason to vote Republican next time. I and many others are willing to accept the consequences of voting conscience rather than party, regardless of how many names you call me, or how much you malign my character or political intelligence."

Please explain exactly where in that paragraph I said that you had ALREADY maligned my character or called me names? WHERE???

So for you to continue to prattle on with that factless claim is at this point pathetic. It did not happen, and even if you repeat the lie a thousand times, it still didn't happen.

Maybe in the morning, after you've had some rest, you can read what I wrote and see that what I said, what I actually said, was that if the two issues are not being serviced, then I and many others are willing to accept the consequences, regardless of how much you (and as I explained earlier, "you" referred to the moderates) call me names and malign my character.

Carefully note the tense I wrote that in: THE FUTURE TENSE. Do you see any English grammar related hint that I was referring to the past tense???? Even though there isn't the least shread of a hint of past tense in that statement, you continue to falsely claim that I said you called me names and maligned my character IN THE PAST.

Give it up. In the clear light of day, and with a plain reading of the actual words of the posts themselves, you are wrong.

And so far, by concentrating on this false and factless claim of yours, you have successfully ducked the real issues that my first post to you centered on. Securing the borders and President Bush's promise of strict constructionist USSC nominees.