I can't believe you're still trying to pimp against the book, claiming it is "admittedly full of lies". The Squirrels are the ones doing the "admitting".
On second thought, I can believe it; it's just par for the course for Squirrels. Seems they're against things beneficial to our economy.
Which is in itself a lie.
Can you show me where Boortz or Linder has admitted that their book was 'full of lies'?
It would take a quote exactly of that nature for your statement to be 'TRUE'.
Fact is, the extent of their 'mea culpa' was that they should have been more clear on one minor point.
But y'all proceed with your usual exercise in straining at gnats while swallowing smelly, stinky camels...
There are NO lies in the book nor has there been anything remotely approaching an admission of one as any OBJECTIVE observer (that leaves you two out doesn't it) can readily determine for themselves.
It would seem therefore, that the only prevaricators around here are you two!
Is it? There is one item in contention but you say it is FULL of lies. There's a difference.
History lesson yn:
"General Washington, we are surrounded, out of food and ammunition. We should surrender, sir."