[Tax-chick]

It called for government and companies to make it easier for women to choose to have children at a younger age, and said: "Free choices cannot be made with partial knowledge, economic disadvantage for mothers, and unsupportive workplaces."

Ooooh, I'm sure more government intervention will fix everything right up.

[najida]

Yeah,
I really feel like you shouldn't put off....

Nevermind ;)

[socialismisinsidious]

There is an entire movement out there called "child-friendly" and it goes way beyond holding the door for a mom with a stroller...it (as I'm sure you can guess) is all about how society, employers and the government should be making life easier for anyone who has a child.....like providing indoor playgrounds in fancy restaurants so adults can eat in peace while little johnny plays or how employers should continue to pay workers past maternity leave so mom can stay home longer...

the organization sounds nice on the surface but if you dig deeper--well, you know the liberal drill.

[metmom]

The editorial claimed employers and health planners were to blame for encouraging women to delay motherhood to focus on careers and financial stability.
Funny, I thought it was the Feminazis who told women to hold off on having children and pursue their careers. After all, they don't want children and it's not their problem if the poor women who believed their propaganda have trouble. The feminazis aren't the ones who end up living with the consequences of their terrible advice. If they really cared about their "sisters" they would let them live their own lives in peace.