To: Jeff Head
I think the big deal is the outrageous level of disrespect for the President. They wouldn't treat Saddam Hussein that way.
8 posted on
09/16/2005 2:41:48 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. - Patrick Henry)
To: thoughtomator
Of course not! Consider the outrage when pictures were published of our favorite dictator in his undies.
13 posted on
09/16/2005 2:43:19 PM PDT by
mcg1969
To: thoughtomator
They wouldn't treat Saddam Hussein that way.Good point!
They put Saddam on the front page in his underwear...
...to show how cruelly he'd been treated.
[spit]
14 posted on
09/16/2005 2:43:56 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
To: thoughtomator
I agree that the actual reporting of such a non-event in an effort to embarass the POTUS is the real story. It is distasteful and digusting.
15 posted on
09/16/2005 2:44:03 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: thoughtomator
I think the big deal is the outrageous level of disrespect for the President. They wouldn't treat Saddam Hussein that way.They published pictures of Saddam in his underwear.
To: thoughtomator
They wouldn't treat Saddam Hussein that way. Well, uh, not to quibble, but we do know if he wears boxers or briefs after all.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson