Skip to comments.
Dartmouth Researchers Build World's Smallest Mobile Robot
Science Daily ^
| 2005-09-16
Posted on 09/16/2005 11:54:36 AM PDT by sourcery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
09/16/2005 11:54:37 AM PDT
by
sourcery
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
2
posted on
09/16/2005 11:55:36 AM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: AntiGuv; PatrickHenry
3
posted on
09/16/2005 11:57:33 AM PDT
by
sourcery
(Givernment: The Democrat spelling for "government.")
To: sourcery
"...At very small scales, this machine is surprisingly fast." At very small scales, so am I.
4
posted on
09/16/2005 12:03:23 PM PDT
by
Egon
(By the way, I took the liberty of fertilizing your caviar.)
To: sourcery
Fascinating. Bump for later reading.
5
posted on
09/16/2005 12:07:28 PM PDT
by
Kevin OMalley
(No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
To: sourcery
"When we say 'controllable,' it means it's like a car; you can steer it anywhere on a flat surface, and drive it wherever you want to go.Yeah, but it sucks as far as legroom goes...
6
posted on
09/16/2005 12:09:51 PM PDT
by
Antonello
To: sourcery
Something that small might be able to travel to outer space on its own, and then go someplace, the moon or an asteroid, and then start terraforming or mining. It's all in the programming.
7
posted on
09/16/2005 12:10:50 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: sourcery
"Danger! Danger! Small robots are bad!"
8
posted on
09/16/2005 12:15:28 PM PDT
by
frankjr
To: sourcery
That explains the voices that I hear. It's really those little robots with loudspeakers.
To: RightWhale
Something that small might be able to travel to outer space on its own, and then go someplace, the moon or an asteroid, and then start terraforming or mining. It's all in the programming.. Nope, it's all in the special, micro-addressable substrate on which it moves. It has no capability of moving through free space.
It may not be "tethered", but it is confined to the equivalent of two-dimensional "rails"...
Can't help but wonder just how large that patterned substrate really is. I would be surprised to learn that it is larger than one cm square.
10
posted on
09/16/2005 12:24:09 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
(Iraq & Afghanistan: Bush's "Bug-Zappers"...)
To: TXnMA
Small stuff can be buoyant and tend to higher elevations if the wind is right. Probably 20 miles is the maximum that could be expected from buoyancy and then another mechanism would need to kick in. It would take a while for a microbot to gain enough speed to arrive at orbit. In the meantime it would have to float. Whether atmospheric drag can be overcome this way might be an interesting exercise for an enterprising aeronautical engineering student. I don't know, but it seems like there might be a way.
11
posted on
09/16/2005 12:30:34 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: sourcery
The Demobots will go ballistic when they find that the Dartmouth 'bots have the visage of Abraham Lincoln!!
Once again the 'Pubs show the way, and according to the picture it's "Eyes Right!!!"
To: RightWhale
The value of these little things are not to send them out into space. They offer no advantage for that. Size is not the limitation in space travel. Their advantage is to have them perform tasks within a larger body, a mechanical or human body.
13
posted on
09/16/2005 12:36:29 PM PDT
by
elfman2
(2 tacos short of a combination plate)
To: elfman2
True. However, we need a way to get out into space at low or zero cost.
14
posted on
09/16/2005 12:43:02 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: RightWhale
" True. However, we need a way to get out into space at low or zero cost." Not really. Thats not the bottle neck. No sense imposing the limitations intrinsic to micobots in order to have hope that some escape into space.
15
posted on
09/16/2005 12:47:31 PM PDT
by
elfman2
(2 tacos short of a combination plate)
To: elfman2
Hams, RC airplane hobbyists, others who like to build things should wonder why they can't get their creations into space just by going out into the yard and letting them go. No muss, no fuss, no smoke and fire, just up and away.
16
posted on
09/16/2005 12:54:11 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: RightWhale
I dont want to discourage creativity. For every 1000 seemingly bad ideas, one turns out to be brilliant. Maybe yours is the one ;^) Regards.
17
posted on
09/16/2005 12:58:48 PM PDT
by
elfman2
(2 tacos short of a combination plate)
To: sourcery
Oh crud next thing you know these things will be back...
18
posted on
09/16/2005 12:58:48 PM PDT
by
Syntyr
To: sourcery
Oh crud next thing you know these things will be back...
Well it worked in Preview mode :(
19
posted on
09/16/2005 1:00:18 PM PDT
by
Syntyr
To: Syntyr
I see the picture just fine.
So, what is that?
20
posted on
09/16/2005 1:04:54 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(Givernment: The Democrat spelling for "government.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson