Posted on 09/16/2005 4:27:56 AM PDT by cloud8
And why would this be a matter of "concern"? In fact, its overdue. Let the Homos cry all they want to.
Now lets move on to the ECUSA next and clean up that rat's nest of depravity.
Are you?
I asked you first. I'm not sure why you quote at length from someone's Bible dictionary in order to get around the basic fact that the English word "priest" comes from the Greek "presbyter," or elder.
SD
I'll rely on St. Jeromes' work, from the fourth and fifth centuries, and who was a much greater linguist than you could ever hope to be.
Rather than go into a long disertation, myself, I cut and pasted a valid response to the question about elders. The early Christians did not recognize a Roman leadership role in the church, and only as time passed, did it come into being. History is always changing. Just ask Joseph Smith when you meet him!.
I have been quoted all sorts of reasons to repent and declare my apostacy. I have been called stupid, ignorant, and worse. However, my understanding is that Jerome never spoke ENGLISH. The Greek writings were translated into the latin vulgate, and not until hundreds of years later, was there any way for the laity to see them.
The popular King James version does the same. It is a translation of a translation.
I use the NIV, because, though it is not a LITERAL translation, it is closest in representing the ACTUAL words written. It was translated by modern scholars, with an awareness of both worlds, and words.
Your entire arguments, collectively, are built on your church's interpretations, and usurpation. I can make my own theology if I add an Apocrypha, or Book of Mormon.
Jesus gave Peter a charge. It wasn't to build a manmade, earthly empire. It was to continue to spread the 'good news' of the Messiah... and Paul never gave anybody authority to set apart a special "priesthood". Jesus is the High Priest. Scripture says that we are His "joint heirs". I don't need to follow the teachings of the RC church, to be saved...
What the meaning of "is" is...
Matthew 16:16ff- And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. 18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. 20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ. 21 From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day. 22 Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee. 23 But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
I have posted Scriptures which are ignored, in a most interesting display of "piety" and "malice" ... Scripture tells me to "shake the dust off my feet'!
Right, because no one in the Roman Empire could read Latin. Your prejudice vastly outweighs your scholarship or reasoning.
(Psst. "Vulgate" is the same root as "vulgar," meaning "common.")
SD
He's crystal clear in 1 Corinthians 7 that the celibate state is to be preferred to the married state.
What do you say to your teenage son when he explains that it is impossible for him not to sleep with his girlfriend?
??? The Greek was translated into Latin because that was the common tongue of the people in the West at the time.
In fact, it was still the common tongue of educated people in Europe a thousand years later. Latin isn't some secret code, you know.
I guess you probably better read St. Paul and become better informed.
Actually what i was trying to say was that in today's modern society it is a lot harder to recruit young men to be celibate. So they went outside the norm and sought young men that were not seeking women, ie homosexuals.
Somehow I didn't get quotes around the previous poster's claim that celibacy is "unscriptural". Your reply and several others are sufficient to show that both Christ and Paul regarded celibacy to be an exalted (though not mandatory) life practice.
Sorry, I didn't realize you were quoting there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.