a look at feingold's rating by GOA and brady shows that he is on the side of gun owners 10% of the time and on the side of brady 75% of the time..
if he was truly a pro-gun, he would know that us v miller wasn't a collective/ individual right case.
You are right. From what I understand, us v Miller was a joke, in the sense that the case was decided WITHOUT the defendants, or their representation, actually being present.
If anything, us v Miller proves that we do have a right to keep and bear arms suited to a militia.