[snarks_when_bored]

If science were religion, you'd have a point; since it isn't, you don't.

Again, read Nagel's book, won't you? I've read the First Amendment (and the others), and much of the Bible. It behooves you to try to understand the nature of that which you're mischaracterizing.

[P-Marlowe]

If science were religion, you'd have a point; since it isn't, you don't.

If evolution were science you might have a point; since it isn't, you don't.